Apparently I missed announcing this blog's one-year birthaversary, which was the 24th of June. So, uh, Happy Birthaversary, Lucioman's Boardgaming Blog; maybe we'll get you a real name instead of this lazy nonsense.
Extra post this week because I've been slacking. I'm considering changing the schedule up, but we'll keep it the same for now, and I also realized I need to review some actual GAMES on this blog, so we'll definitely see more of those in the near future.
My cousin Randy visited on the weekend and
asked me attempted to goad me into playing a boardgame I
wasn't interested in playing. He told me it's a great game; I told him it took too long to set up (an issue, as they had limited time to visit), was one-sided, and there are better games to play. Admittedly, the last point may not have been entirely fair, but I was also watching my two toddlers, who require a certain level of attention. One of them does have the middle name "Danger," after all.
My cousin's retort: "So we'll never play this game again." I was taken aback. First, Randy was on the verge of breaking
Rule #6--then again, Randy's basically always on the verge of breaking Rule #6, but I love him--he's my cousin, but may as well be a brother. Second, it isn't a bad game, but I was confused by my own statement, "There are better games." Third, if I really believed that, shouldn't I trade the game away?